chet not stupid

chet smart.

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

chet having hard time with ibp.

chet having hard time with ibp. opponent say chet worked for ibp. chet say he didn't. signed statement by chet say he did. who should chet believe? even chets shirt say ibp love chet.




chet selling lots of shirts. chet have hats too. click picture to go to store. chet not making profit, he just tell people chet not stupid on clothes.

15 Comments:

At 5/10/2006 11:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is the best Blouin can do, a lobbying contract signed over 15 years ago. Proves Culver is kicking Blouin's ass. Hey Mike, did you believe in PLA's and minimum wage 15 years ago? Or was it 20? or 25? What do you believe in now?

 
At 5/10/2006 12:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So -- Chet can take credit for what he "did" at 24, claiming in his commericial with a comically stern face that he "helped clean up big oil" when he "worked" in the Attorney General's office...but he is absolved of what he did at 22 and 23?

You guys are as stupid and illogical as your boss.

 
At 5/10/2006 12:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You got it Pat. How he can take credit for something the Attorney General did is beyond me. Chet couldn't even pass law school.

 
At 5/10/2006 2:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

IBP? IBP?

Chet thought IBP meant

"IMA BIG PIG."

Now Chet really confused.

 
At 5/10/2006 3:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Culver never lobbied for IBP. Blouin did sell out Iowa tax payers, though (Grow Iowa Values Fund). Who should we be more pissed at?

 
At 5/10/2006 7:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So you're gonna vote for Culver because Blouin's a bigger sellout? Chet's still a sellout. Why can't there be a third option? Oh wait, there is. Get your act together, people.

 
At 5/10/2006 7:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A signed statement says otherwise, 3:40. If you think for a second his last name wasn't used to further IBP's agenda, you're sadly naive about the lobbying industry. He wasn't at that firm for his brain power (proof available at every turn), the firm wanted his name on their roster to benefit all of their clients from IBP on down. Even Chet should have realized that fact.

 
At 5/11/2006 9:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's the big deal? It isn't like IBP is the devil...the devil only has two cloven feet.

 
At 5/11/2006 1:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Then isn't IBP twice as bad as the devil?

Culver obviously thinks something's wrong with it. He's not saying "Who cares?" He's lying about it.

 
At 5/11/2006 2:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

this is pathetic. Who cares, really? If this is the best Blouin has, then Culver is pretty clean. Blouin should be a hell of a lot more worried about Maytag closing.

 
At 5/12/2006 10:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Vote Fallon.

 
At 5/12/2006 12:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, anon 10:49 ... Simple and to the point ... I like it! Let me reiterate it: Vote Fallon.

 
At 5/12/2006 2:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, Ed, get off Chet's web site

 
At 5/12/2006 3:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

People, People, People! There's only one thing to do: VOTE FALLON!

 
At 5/18/2006 3:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your site is on top of my favourites - Great work I like it.
»

 

Post a Comment

<< Home